• About
    • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?
  • Market Urbanism Podcast
  • Adam Hengels
  • Stephen Smith
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Jeff Fong
  • Nolan Gray
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Transportation
  • zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • How to Fight Gentrification
  • Culture of Congestion by Sandy Ikeda
  • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?

Why Money for Schools Means No Permits For Housing

April 30, 2015 By Jeff Fong

Housing has a lot going against it in the California. But amidst all the legal, political, and regulatory roadblocks, there’s one law that sneaks by largely unnoticed: Prop 98.

Prop 98 guarantees a minimum level of state spending on education each year. Sacramento pools most city, county, and special district property taxes into special education funds to meet this commitment. The localities only get to keep a small part of the property tax revenues for their own general budgets.

This system creates a disincentive for cities to permit housing. New housing brings in new residents who need city services. But it doesn’t bring in a commensurate increase in property taxes since most of that revenue gets scooped up by Sacramento.

Commercial development, though, brings in taxes a city gets to keep. Sales and hotel taxes are significant revenue streams. And they don’t cause the kinds of strain on city services that new residential does.

Reforming Prop 98 might be low hanging fruit. Changing the formula to appropriate a broader stream of city revenues might help ease the bias against housing. And it might even be possible to amend the law without having to fight the California Teachers Association. As long as there’s no net decrease in education funding, of course.

stack_of_books

For those not acquainted with California politics, the California Teacher’s Association (CTA) is the most potent lobby in Sacramento. If the CTA doesn’t like a bill, it doesn’t become a law.

 

It’s tough to say exactly how much new housing Prop 98 actually prevents. Different cities get to keep different amounts of their property taxes, so the disincentive differs case to case. And there are plenty of other things like CEQA and Prop 13 which put a drag on new construction as well. But where CEQA and Prop 13 make it easier for residents who are already NIMBYs to gum up the works, Prop 98 is a reason in itself for a city to avoid residential development. So while we can’t do much to change the aesthetic preferences of our neighbors, we can do something to change the law. And if tweaking one law makes cities see new housing as a financial boon instead of a burden, it might be worth the effort.

 

Tweet

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: housing, Law, Policy Tagged With: California, housing, property taxes, proposition 98, taxes

About Jeff Fong

Jeff writes about technology, markets, and policy. He's spent most of his professional career at on-demand logistics platforms like Lyft and Postmates. He also serves on the board of Yimby Action, a policy advocacy organization dedicated to housing and land use reform.

Comments

  1. dr says

    April 30, 2015 at 10:57 am

    Problematically speculative.

  2. Roland Solinski says

    May 1, 2015 at 1:13 am

    Prop 98 is intended to ensure equal distribution of education spending per-pupil, right? Assuming the property tax is the main means of supporting education, that means some areas are net donors, other are net recipients, largely based on the local property values. Areas with moderate to low property values then wouldn’t experience this same disincentive for new housing. This might be a beneficial side effect of Prop 98, if it pushes housing growth into areas where it wouldn’t otherwise occur.

  3. Kenny Easwaran says

    May 1, 2015 at 10:41 am

    Although doesn’t this just perpetuate the NIMBY dynamic of rich and expensive (and desirable) cities like San Francisco and Palo Alto refusing to construct new housing, and hope for poorer and less desirable cities to make up the difference? This is already what goes on within cities, because rich neighborhoods have a lot of power in their NIMBYism while poor neighborhoods don’t.

  4. peterhsu says

    May 11, 2015 at 3:28 pm

    I think it’s fair to say that this is a big problem on both the Peninsula as well as in the Lafayette-Orinda-Walnut Creek area. You have cities who are more than happy to clear the way for job-bringing development but have no appetite for new housing.

Trackbacks

  1. Misguided Funding Formulae Stunt Housing Growth | therhinorceros says:
    April 30, 2015 at 10:34 pm

    […] http://www.marketurbanism.com/2015/04/30/why-money-for-schools-means-no-permits-for-housing/ […]

  2. Linkluster Yunomae to Saiki | Hit Coffee says:
    July 24, 2015 at 6:36 am

    […] Jeff Fong argues that California spending more on schools means fewer permits for housing. […]

  3. Linky Friday #137: Nixon’s The One | Ordinary Times says:
    October 22, 2015 at 7:20 pm

    […] [Ho3] Jeff Fong argues that California spending more on schools means fewer permits for housing. […]

Market Urbanism Podcast

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Long-term renters ARE short-term renters (maybe)
  • Book Review: Arbitrary Lines – How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It
  • Unpacking Emergent Tokyo with author Jorge Almazán
  • Book Review: The Making of Urban Japan
  • Review: Homelessness is a Housing Problem
  • Land Value Taxation and Intertemporal Tradeoffs
  • Entrepreneurs and the Changing Political Economy of Housing
  • Protecting Housing Affordability by Protecting the Right to Build Housing
  • Reasons to be a Census skeptic
  • Are there places in America with diversity *and* equality?
  • Do HOAs justify zoning?
  • California should indeed build new cities – but don’t let Nathan J. Robinson anywhere near them
My Tweets

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Culture of Congestion
  • Environmental and Urban Economics
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Let A Thousand Nations Bloom
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Mike Munger | Kids Prefer Cheese
  • Neighborhood Effects
  • New Urbs
  • NYU Stern Urbanization Project
  • Parafin
  • Peter Gordon's Blog
  • Propmodo
  • The Beacon
  • ThinkMarkets

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Austin Contrarian
  • City Comforts
  • City Notes | Daniel Kay Hertz
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Emergent Urbanism
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Old Urbanist
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen Radar
  • Reinventing Parking
  • streetsblog
  • Strong Towns
  • Systemic Failure
  • The Micro Maker
  • The Urbanophile

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 Market Urbanism

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.