• About
    • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?
  • Market Urbanism Podcast
  • Adam Hengels
  • Stephen Smith
  • Emily Hamilton
  • Jeff Fong
  • Nolan Gray
  • Contact

Market Urbanism

Liberalizing cities | From the bottom up

“Market Urbanism” refers to the synthesis of classical liberal economics and ethics (market), with an appreciation of the urban way of life and its benefits to society (urbanism). We advocate for the emergence of bottom up solutions to urban issues, as opposed to ones imposed from the top down.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Podcast
  • Economics
  • housing
  • planning
  • Transportation
  • zoning
  • Urban[ism] Legends
  • How to Fight Gentrification
  • Culture of Congestion by Sandy Ikeda
  • What Should I Read to Understand Zoning?

Rent Control Again

May 24, 2017 By Michael Lewyn

A blog post in Pacific Standard seeks to defend rent control- an idea that, as the author admits, is generally detested by economists.

The author writes that “rent regulations give tenants a greater stake in their community and incentivize them to put time, energy, and even money into their homes.” But that’s not necessarily a good thing- in a heavily regulated market, a “stake in the community” means that tenants, like homeowners, have an incentive to engage in NIMBYism. So in a prosperous area rent control hits housing supply with a double whammy- more recruits for the NIMBY army AND less incentive for landlords to invest in housing.

He also endorses the “Unlimited Demand” theory, acknowledging the argument that building more market rate housing creates more affordable housing eventually, but responds: “not in tight markets like Silicon Valley and New York City. ” This claim is of course a self-fulfilling prophecy: people use it to justify opposing new housing, which in turn ensures that supply can never meet demand.  (I critique the argument in more detail here).

However, the article does contain one non-silly argument: that rent-controlled cities do occasionally experience building booms (most notably New York in the 1950s).  Rent control is a factor relating to housing supply, but not the only one.

So here’s my modest proposal for pro-regulation politicians: a city can adopt rent control to protect existing tenants, as long as they deregulate in other ways in order to promote new construction.   So for example, a state law could provide that municipalities could adopt rent control under one condition: no more exclusion of new housing.  So if San Mateo County wants to adopt rent control, they can do it as long as all new housing is exempt from all of the city’s use and density restrictions. The absence of zoning makes up for the supply-reducing effects of housing.

This wouldn’t need to be on a citywide basis; a city could create “rent control zones” that had rent limits but were zoning-free.   This policy might be workable in gentrifying areas where people are especially worried about displacement.

Tweet

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Gentrification, Michael Lewyn, rent control Tagged With: gentrificiation, rent control

Comments

  1. Butler Reynolds says

    May 24, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    I’m usually polite about others who have viewpoints that differ from mine. But I just can’t help it with two issues: rent control and minimum wage. Those are two drop-dead stupid policies. I cannot even pretend to imagine what is going through the heads of those who think that these are good ideas.

  2. Flakker says

    May 24, 2017 at 8:36 pm

    I think this is a sound idea. The basic principle of rent control is to stabilize the neighborhood; a growing neighborhood cannot stabilize without more supply. In New York City, the idea of entrenched, subsidized residents fighting housing for those who subsidize them is a galling problem and this is a simple deal everyone can understand.

Market Urbanism Podcast

Connect With Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • The conspiracy theory of rent increases
  • Herbert Hoover reconsidered
  • YIMBYs and liberals
  • Introducing Szymon Pifczyk
  • Are the new carbon footprint maps accurate?
  • Wanted: Market urbanist research assistant
  • An Anti-Anti-NIMBY article
  • Would the Vienna strategy work here?
  • Louisville and density regulation
  • Urban Paths “World” Cup
  • Is affordability just, “You get what you pay for”?
  • Before YIMBY
My Tweets

Market Sites Urbanists should check out

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Culture of Congestion
  • Environmental and Urban Economics
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Let A Thousand Nations Bloom
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Mike Munger | Kids Prefer Cheese
  • Neighborhood Effects
  • New Urbs
  • NYU Stern Urbanization Project
  • Parafin
  • Peter Gordon's Blog
  • Propmodo
  • The Beacon
  • ThinkMarkets

Urbanism Sites capitalists should check out

  • Austin Contrarian
  • City Comforts
  • City Notes | Daniel Kay Hertz
  • Discovering Urbanism
  • Emergent Urbanism
  • Granola Shotgun
  • Old Urbanist
  • Pedestrian Observations
  • Planetizen Radar
  • Reinventing Parking
  • streetsblog
  • Strong Towns
  • Systemic Failure
  • The Micro Maker
  • The Urbanophile

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 Market Urbanism

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.